Alabama’s congressional delegation should oppose a harmful budget bill that would reduce or remove food assistance, health coverage and other vital services for hundreds of thousands of Alabamians who struggle to afford basic needs, Alabama Arise and other advocates said Thursday during a Hands Off SNAP and Medicaid news conference at the State House in Montgomery.

The U.S. Senate could vote on the bill, HR 1, as soon as this weekend. The U.S. House passed its version of the legislation by a narrow 215-214 vote in May. Both versions include deep cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and to health coverage under Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. And both versions also include large tax cuts for wealthy households and highly profitable corporations.

“It’s wrong to hurt people who are struggling just to help people who are already far ahead. That’s exactly what the Senate is debating right now,” Alabama Arise executive director Robyn Hyden said during the news conference. “The budget moving through Congress is not only a moral failure. It’s bad policy, and it is a really bad deal for our state.”

Photos from the news conference are available here. A video of the news conference is available here. (Remarks start at the 2:00 mark.)

SNAP cuts would send hunger soaring, imperil local retailers

For every meal that food banks provide in Alabama, SNAP provides nine. But if state lawmakers could not or would not provide new SNAP funding required under the bill, Alabama could be forced to cut SNAP benefits significantly – or even eliminate the program altogether for nearly 800,000 participants statewide.

Deep SNAP cuts could leave food banks with a “perhaps insurmountable” challenge, said Michael Ledger, president and CEO of Feeding the Gulf Coast, a food bank serving southwestern Alabama, southern Mississippi and western Florida.

“We’re worried that SNAP reductions are going to have a dramatic impact on our ability to help our neighbors,” Ledger said. “We’ve seen so many people who would have never dreamed they’d be in that position, in that position. I think as a community, it’s our responsibility to make sure we help these people through those struggles. If we don’t, where do they go?”

Rhonda Mann, executive director of VOICES for Alabama’s Children, said nearly 5,000 retailers statewide redeemed more than $2 billion in SNAP benefits in 2023. She said the wreckage of harmful SNAP cuts would reach far beyond program participants.

“SNAP is incredibly important to the economy of our state. So when you don’t think this affects you because you don’t receive SNAP benefits, think again,” Mann said. “What you’re going to see are the closings of food retailers, and that will hurt everybody. Access to food in some areas of our state is already a problem, and it could become a problem in every area of our state.”

SNAP cost shift would strain state budgets

The federal budget bill could add severe strain to Alabama’s General Fund budget. Under the House-passed bill, states would have to pay for a portion of SNAP benefits, which have been 100% federally funded for decades, according to a sliding scale. The bill also would require states to pay for 75% of SNAP administrative costs, up from the current 50%.

Those cost shifts could leave Alabama on the hook for more than $120 million a year in direct benefits and additional administrative costs. For a sense of scale, that amount would be almost identical to the state’s Education Trust Fund (ETF) budget appropriations next year for both Jacksonville State University and the University of North Alabama combined. In a worst-case scenario, the state could be forced to find nearly $300 million a year for SNAP. That would be more than the 2026 ETF appropriation for either the University of Alabama or Auburn University.

While increasing Alabama’s cost to administer SNAP, the bill also would expand work reporting requirements to cover many more participants. Hyden said these changes would harm many veterans, people experiencing homelessness, and young adults aging out of foster care. She also warned that many families could lose food assistance not because of a failure to work but because of a failure to complete complicated paperwork.

“These cuts will see hunger skyrocket while our state government, churches and charities and everyday working families are struggling to get by, and we’re all going to pay for that,” Hyden said. “It’s going to reduce our ability to fund existing essential services and programs. And we are going to be left on the hook to pick up the slack while billionaires and corporations run off with a bigger slice of the pie.”

Medicaid, ACA cuts would increase health care costs across Alabama

The Senate bill also would make health coverage more expensive or less accessible for tens of thousands of Alabamians. The legislation would allow the expiration of extra financial help for health coverage through HealthCare.gov and would block Alabama from receiving an additional $619 million in federal incentives to expand Medicaid to cover adults with low incomes. In total, nearly 200,000 Alabamians could lose health coverage as a result of the bill’s changes.

These coverage losses could make health care even less accessible in rural areas of Alabama, Mann said. Fourteen rural hospitals in the state have closed since 2010, and more than 20 others are at risk of closing.

“Medicaid dollars are for services and resources we all use, and cuts to Medicaid are going to result in increased health care costs for all of us,” Mann said.

Hyden underscored the human toll that losing health coverage could take on families and communities across Alabama.

“Cutting Medicaid and cutting the enhanced HealthCare.gov tax credits is going to mean one less early cancer diagnosis for your neighbor,” she said. “Your pregnant friend might die when her preeclampsia isn’t caught or treated in time because she has to drive over an hour to get to her doctor. Your daughter might experience a mental health crisis and have no way to access and pay for care.”

Rev. Valtoria Jackson, the Montgomery lead organizer for the Alabama Poor People’s Campaign, called the bill’s proposed cuts to food assistance and health care “a war on the poor.”

“This is not just bad policy. It is a moral sin,” Jackson said. “We know that when people lose access to health care, they die. When food stamps are cut, hunger rises.”

‘Do something better for our state’

State Sen. Kirk Hatcher, D-Montgomery, said he sees up close the struggles that people living in poverty face, both as a legislator and in his role as Head Start director in Montgomery County. Passing legislation to make life even harder for struggling families would be “an absolute moral abomination,” he said.

“I do know what this particular bill and many of the things in it will do to damage the lives of so many,” Hatcher said. “Every life – and I do mean every life – has value. … We can do better.”

Jackson said the federal budget bill would cause significant harm to “the least of these” and urged Congress to reject it.

“Budgets are moral documents, not just numbers. And this budget is morally bankrupt,” Jackson said. “The budget will not reduce poverty at all; it will increase it. It will not help seniors live with dignity; it will push them deeper into despair. It will not uphold Alabama’s moral values; it will betray them.”

Hyden closed by urging U.S. Sens. Katie Britt and Tommy Tuberville to oppose cuts to food assistance and health care and to focus instead on policies that would improve the well-being of every Alabamian.

“We have time to ask Congress to do something better for our state,” Hyden said. “We ask you to protect essential services like SNAP and Medicaid to help us build strong, healthy communities. For the future of our state, for our children and families, for all of us who struggle and anyone who might struggle, please vote no on HR 1.”

More resources

Thursday: A photo gallery and a video livestream from the Hands Off SNAP and Medicaid news conference at the State House in Montgomery.

June 10: A letter from Alabama Arise and 49 partner organizations urging Gov. Kay Ivey and legislators to oppose harmful SNAP cuts and cost shifts.

June 5: A letter from 52 Cover Alabama coalition partners, including Alabama Arise, urging Ivey and legislators to oppose harmful cuts to Medicaid and health coverage under the Affordable Care Act.

May 23: A statement from Alabama Arise on numerous ways that the U.S. House budget bill would harm struggling Alabama families.

Feb. 25: A letter from Alabama Arise and 111 partner organizations urging Alabama’s congressional delegation to oppose cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.

Jan. 29: A letter from Alabama Arise and 55 partner organizations urging Alabama’s congressional delegation to oppose further tax cuts for wealthy people.